Oregon Governor, Nonprofit Support Mandatory National Service

The Democratic Governor of Oregon, Ted Kulongoski, and the Olympic Institute for Leadership Development have separately called for a mandatory program requiring two years of national service. The governor, in an interview run on 10 May 2007 in the Oregonian called for a change in how the military recruits its membership.

For example, he comes about as close [as] you can to advocating a return to the draft. The all-volunteer military is becoming obsolete, he suggests, and says a mandatory two years of national service is the answer.

"If the military is an optional part of national service, that's fine." [Kulongoski said.]

In a related blog posting, [National Service Draft] Brian M. Douglass, president and CEO of the Olympic Institute for Leadership Development, outlines his support for such a program and describes in some detail how it might be developed.

Bravo for this understanding of the opportunities for national service and the practical exploration of how it might be unrolled. The issue continues to come up across the country. Tell your friends and encourage them to sign the Everyone Serves petition to show that support.

Comments

National Obligated Service

Rob, clearly your organization is trying hard to convince the decisioin makers to embrace and fund National Obligated Service. The idea does enjoy widespread support among the public. We (OILD) believe that the funding answer lies in the elimination of the current All Volunteer Military which is unsustainable going forward and replacing it with NOS. Then these funds are transfered to NOS and the problem is resolved. What say you?

There are Many Sources of Existing Funds

I'm not an expert on the ins and outs of federal funding, but it seems to me that in addition to the recruiting budgets of the armed forces there are also job training funds and other programs that could be replaced by a national service approach. These transfers would limit the cost of the program.

New funding may well be required for a program that touches all Americans, but the return delivered by this kind of program would far exceed its cost. Just as effective preschools and mentoring programs save many times the cost in better life outcomes (and reduced public spending for social services and prisons) so too would the investment in the citizenship of the nation's youth produce results beyond the cost.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

What is 47 + 7?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.